Erin Patterson is happy against his termination of the murder on seven grounds, including “Irregularity” in the investigation of the police and media in the trial of the trial of “unfairness”.
According to documents filed in the Victorian Court of Justice and released to the media on Wednesday, Patterson also intends to appeal the views of the Cell Tower that is not allowed in his home – not allowed. He also encouraged evidence from so-called Facebook friends, who met Patterson through a real crime group, should also not be heard during the trial.
Patterson filed appeal documents Monday, but a date has yet to be set for the case to be heard.
In September, Patterson, 51, was sentenced to life in prison with a non-parole period of 33 years for the murders of his estranged wife’s estranged parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and Heather Wilkinson. He was also convicted of the attempted murder of Heather’s husband, Ian Wilkinson, who survived lunch after spending weeks in hospital.
While deliberating its verdict, the jury was sequestered in a hotel where police and members of the media were staying. According to reports, the matter was raised by the authorities with his lawyers at the time, but no concerns about the process were raised in court.
“A fundamental irregularity occurred while the jury was being instituted which undermined the integrity of the verdicts and justice must be done in order to do justice.
“Cell Tower evidence and evidence of death Loch mushroom sightings and outtim that do not account for this evidence
“The known trial judge erred in ruling that the photos and videos related to the mushrooms and found on an SD card in the case of the prosecution occurred in justice.”
The other four grounds of appeal appeal to Patterson’s participation in prosecutors for five days, along with issues of other evidence, and the opening and closing addresses of the prosecution.
This included “Facebook evidence”, which Patterson Farge included evidence from “friends” and messages, and should not have been added to the applicant’s trial.
“A substantial miscarriage of justice occurred due to the unfair and oppressive cross-examination of the applicant,” court documents.
After the newsletter promotion
“The closing of the prosecution has caused many miscarriages of justice.
“A great miscarriage of justice has occurred due to the opening of the case for the prosecution on the basis that the prosecution’s research in this case by concluding it by stating it is, in fact, a motive for the murder.”
Cross-examination and opening and closing addresses were completed by Nanette Rogers SC for the prosecution. Patterson’s legal team now includes attorneys Richard Edney and Vononika Drogo.